LANGUAGE MODEL OpenAI Last updated:

OpenAI o3

Frontier Reasoning at Scale

OpenAI's full o3 release in April 2025, after a December 2024 teaser. Step-change on math, code, and frontier reasoning benchmarks; the first model to convincingly beat the ARC-AGI visual-reasoning challenge (long held up as a "true general intelligence" benchmark). Native tool use during reasoning — the model decides mid-thought to run code, search the web, or call external APIs.

Intelligence
Medium
Speed
Slow
24 tok/s output
Cost
High
$20.00 in / $80.00 out
Context
200K
Up to 200,000 tokens
How are Intelligence, Speed & Cost bucketed?
Intelligence and Speed buckets are percentile ranks on Artificial Analysis. Cost buckets are fixed dollar thresholds keyed off output-token price ($/M out).
Intelligence
  • Top 1%≤ 1%
  • Top 5%≤ 5%
  • Top 10%≤ 10%
  • Good≤ 25%
  • Medium≤ 50%
  • Below avg> 50%
Speed
  • Top 1%≥ 345 tok/s
  • Top 5%≥ 237 tok/s
  • Top 10%≥ 196 tok/s
  • Good≥ 146 tok/s
  • Medium≥ 90 tok/s
  • Slow< 90 tok/s
Cost
  • Freeopen weights · self-host
  • Low< $1 / M out
  • Moderate$1–5 / M out
  • High≥ $5 / M out

Why it matters

o3 set the high-water mark for frontier capability in 2025 and became the reference benchmark for "what's the best AI can do?" debates in policy, education, and labor-market analysis. The ARC-AGI result specifically reignited the AGI-timeline discussion across AI safety circles.

Core Capabilities

Long Documents
Handles entire codebases, books, and multi-doc RAG.
Reasoning
Solves complex math, logic, and planning tasks.
Agent Workflows
Built for tool use and autonomous tasks.
Vision
Understands images, scenes, and visual context.

Context Window

200k tokens
≈ 154+ pages
4k Chat 聊天
32k Long docs 长文档
128k Books 整本书
400k Multi-doc 多文档
1M Codebase 整个代码库
10M
200k

Availability

API
Available
Product / App
Available
Open Source
Not released
Enterprise
Contact sales

Pricing Model

Pay per token
Input and output billed separately.
Pay-per-token

Capability / Performance

Where this model sits relative to the middle 60% of models in the tree. All scores are 0–10 (higher is better).

Lower 20% Upper 80% This model
Reasoning
AA Intelligence Index · scaled to 10
1.7
5.6
5.8
Context / memory
Context window size · log-scaled
6.0
9.0
6.7
Cost efficiency
Input price ($/M tokens) · cheaper scores higher
6.2
10.0
0.0
Lower 20% 20th percentile — 20% of models score below this This model Where the current model lands Upper 80% 80th percentile — only 20% of models score above this Percentile boundaries are computed across every model in the tree that reports the underlying benchmark for each capability.

What it feels like

  • Step-change on ARC-AGI-1 — 75.7% at the public $10K compute limit, 87.5% at high compute (172x)
  • But ARC-AGI-2 (March 2025) cratered the narrative: <3% on the harder benchmark vs 60% for the average human
  • The released April-2025 o3 is NOT the December preview — preview had ARC-AGI-1 in its training, public version is more honest
  • TechCrunch reported the released o3 scored lower than initial OpenAI claims implied
  • Reasoning trace is much faster than o1 and the honesty/calibration of the chain improved noticeably
  • Still expensive at high effort; still slow on the hardest tasks

Best use cases

  • Frontier reasoning research and benchmark exploration
  • Hard math (AIME, IMO-style) and graduate-level science (GPQA)
  • Code that needs novel algorithm design rather than scaffolded refactors
  • Tool-using agents that benefit from longer reasoning windows

Tools to try

Not ideal for

  • Latency-sensitive chat — o3-mini or GPT-4o are far faster
  • Tasks framed slightly outside training distribution — Apple's variable-rename study still applies
  • Bulk inference — high-effort o3 is one of the most expensive options on the market

Model Evolution

o is OpenAI's language model family.

View full evolution tree →