LANGUAGE MODEL Anthropic Last updated:

Model Context Protocol

Open Tool / Context Standard

An open protocol Anthropic released in November 2024 for standardizing how AI agents talk to external tools, data sources, and contextual services. Instead of every AI app integrating every tool individually (M apps × N tools = M×N integrations), MCP lets any tool publish an MCP server once and any AI app consume it. Quickly adopted by OpenAI, Google, cursor / IDE vendors, and thousands of community integrations.

Cost
Free
Open weights — self-host
How are Intelligence, Speed & Cost bucketed?
Intelligence and Speed buckets are percentile ranks on Artificial Analysis. Cost buckets are fixed dollar thresholds keyed off output-token price ($/M out).
Intelligence
  • Top 1%≤ 1%
  • Top 5%≤ 5%
  • Top 10%≤ 10%
  • Good≤ 25%
  • Medium≤ 50%
  • Below avg> 50%
Speed
  • Top 1%≥ 345 tok/s
  • Top 5%≥ 237 tok/s
  • Top 10%≥ 196 tok/s
  • Good≥ 146 tok/s
  • Medium≥ 90 tok/s
  • Slow< 90 tok/s
Cost
  • Freeopen weights · self-host
  • Low< $1 / M out
  • Moderate$1–5 / M out
  • High≥ $5 / M out

Why it matters

MCP is the most successful open standard to come out of the LLM era. Whether it persists as the dominant agent protocol over the next 5 years (vs being replaced by something else) is the open question — but its current momentum makes it the de facto standard for agent integration in 2025-26.

Core Capabilities

Agent Workflows
Built for tool use and autonomous tasks.
Long Documents
Handles entire codebases, books, and multi-doc RAG.

Context Window

Context window not disclosed.

Availability

API
Not available
Product / App
Not available
Open Source
Released
Enterprise

Pricing Model

Free / self-host
Open weights — pay only for compute.
Self-host

Capability / Performance

Where this model sits relative to the middle 60% of models in the tree. All scores are 0–10 (higher is better).

Lower 20% Upper 80% This model
Lower 20% 20th percentile — 20% of models score below this This model Where the current model lands Upper 80% 80th percentile — only 20% of models score above this Percentile boundaries are computed across every model in the tree that reports the underlying benchmark for each capability.

What it feels like

  • Language model from Anthropic — see the linked sources below for benchmark and review coverage
  • Tool-use and agent loops are the typical fit per the published model card

Best use cases

  • Agent / tool-use workflows that match the model's published benchmarks
  • See the model spec and sources block for benchmarked use cases

Tools to try

Not ideal for

  • Tasks far outside the modalities listed in this model's spec
  • Workflows where a more recent successor in the same family scores higher

Model Evolution

View full evolution tree →