MODEL Microsoft

ResNet

Deep Residual Learning

A 2015 architecture from Microsoft Research that introduced "skip connections" — letting deep neural networks pass information around layers instead of through them. The trick allowed networks to be 100+ layers deep where prior attempts had been capped at ~20. Won ImageNet 2015 by surpassing human accuracy for the first time, and remains the default backbone for vision tasks a decade later.

Cost
Free
Open weights — self-host
How are Intelligence, Speed & Cost bucketed?
Intelligence and Speed buckets are percentile ranks on Artificial Analysis. Cost buckets are fixed dollar thresholds keyed off output-token price ($/M out).
Intelligence
  • Top 1%≤ 1%
  • Top 5%≤ 5%
  • Top 10%≤ 10%
  • Good≤ 25%
  • Medium≤ 50%
  • Below avg> 50%
Speed
  • Top 1%≥ 345 tok/s
  • Top 5%≥ 237 tok/s
  • Top 10%≥ 196 tok/s
  • Good≥ 146 tok/s
  • Medium≥ 90 tok/s
  • Slow< 90 tok/s
Cost
  • Freeopen weights · self-host
  • Low< $1 / M out
  • Moderate$1–5 / M out
  • High≥ $5 / M out

Why it matters

ResNet's residual connection is the most-cited architectural primitive in modern deep learning — used in essentially every network with more than ~10 layers. Without it, the depth that enables scaling laws would not be practically achievable.

Core Capabilities

Vision
Understands images, scenes, and visual context.
Research
Foundational paper or scientific contribution.

Context Window

Context window not disclosed.

Availability

API
Not available
Product / App
Not available
Open Source
Released
Enterprise

Pricing Model

Free / self-host
Open weights — pay only for compute.
Self-host

Capability / Performance

Where this model sits relative to the middle 60% of models in the tree. All scores are 0–10 (higher is better).

Lower 20% Upper 80% This model
Lower 20% 20th percentile — 20% of models score below this This model Where the current model lands Upper 80% 80th percentile — only 20% of models score above this Percentile boundaries are computed across every model in the tree that reports the underlying benchmark for each capability.

What it feels like

  • Vision-language model from Microsoft — see the linked sources below for benchmark and review coverage
  • Vision and multimodal tasks are the typical fit per the published model card

Best use cases

  • Vision tasks (charts, documents, images) per the model card
  • See the model spec and sources block for benchmarked use cases

Tools to try

Not ideal for

  • Tasks far outside the modalities listed in this model's spec
  • Workflows where a more recent successor in the same family scores higher

He, K. · Zhang, X. · Ren, S. · Sun, J.