LANGUAGE MODEL Mistral AI Last updated:

Mixtral 8x7B

Open Sparse Mixture-of-Experts

A French startup's open-weight model that activates only 13B of its 47B parameters for any given input — a design that delivers the quality of a 70B model at the inference cost of a 13B one. Released via a magnet link with no documentation, it became the first open-weight Mixture-of-Experts model competitive with proprietary competitors.

Intelligence
Below avg
Cost
Low
$0.45 in / $0.70 out
Context
33K
Up to 32,768 tokens
How are Intelligence, Speed & Cost bucketed?
Intelligence and Speed buckets are percentile ranks on Artificial Analysis. Cost buckets are fixed dollar thresholds keyed off output-token price ($/M out).
Intelligence
  • Top 1%≤ 1%
  • Top 5%≤ 5%
  • Top 10%≤ 10%
  • Good≤ 25%
  • Medium≤ 50%
  • Below avg> 50%
Speed
  • Top 1%≥ 345 tok/s
  • Top 5%≥ 237 tok/s
  • Top 10%≥ 196 tok/s
  • Good≥ 146 tok/s
  • Medium≥ 90 tok/s
  • Slow< 90 tok/s
Cost
  • Freeopen weights · self-host
  • Low< $1 / M out
  • Moderate$1–5 / M out
  • High≥ $5 / M out

Why it matters

Mixtral's release proved that sparse architectures could ship in open weights at frontier-comparable quality. Every subsequent MoE open release (DeepSeek V2/V3, Qwen-MoE, Snowflake Arctic) traces its strategy to this launch. Marked the transition of open-source LLM development from "Llama clones" to architectural diversity.

Core Capabilities

Long Documents
Handles entire codebases, books, and multi-doc RAG.
Generative
Produces images, video, audio, or other media.
Research
Foundational paper or scientific contribution.

Context Window

33k tokens
≈ 25 pages
4k Chat 聊天
32k This model 本模型
128k Books 整本书
400k Multi-doc 多文档
1M Codebase 整个代码库
10M

Availability

API
Not available
Product / App
Not available
Open Source
Released
Enterprise

Pricing Model

Free / self-host
Open weights — pay only for compute.
Self-host

Capability / Performance

Where this model sits relative to the middle 60% of models in the tree. All scores are 0–10 (higher is better).

Lower 20% Upper 80% This model
Reasoning
AA Intelligence Index · scaled to 10
1.7
5.6
1.1
Coding
SciCode · scaled to 10
1.8
4.3
0.3
Context / memory
Context window size · log-scaled
6.0
9.0
4.0
Cost efficiency
Input price ($/M tokens) · cheaper scores higher
6.2
10.0
10.0
Lower 20% 20th percentile — 20% of models score below this This model Where the current model lands Upper 80% 80th percentile — only 20% of models score above this Percentile boundaries are computed across every model in the tree that reports the underlying benchmark for each capability.

What it feels like

  • First major MoE open-weights release that actually worked for production — 46.7B total / 13B active per token
  • 6x faster inference than Llama 2 70B at equal-or-better quality on most benchmarks
  • Outperformed GPT-3.5 on the LMSYS arena while being fully open-weight under Apache 2.0
  • MT-Bench score earned 'best open-weights model as of December 2023'
  • Vastly better than Llama 2 70B on math, code, and multilingual benchmarks
  • Set the architectural template (router + sparse experts) followed by every later open MoE

Best use cases

  • Open-source production inference where Llama 2 70B was too slow
  • Multilingual workloads (Mixtral was particularly strong outside English at release)
  • Self-hosted RAG and code-completion stacks under Apache 2.0
  • Research into MoE routing, distillation, and serving

Tools to try

Not ideal for

  • Frontier reasoning by 2025 — superseded by Mixtral 8x22B, Llama 3.x, DeepSeek V3, Qwen 3
  • Latency-sensitive single-GPU edge deployments (8 experts × 7B still demands meaningful VRAM)
  • Vision / multimodal tasks — text only at this generation

Jiang, A. Q. · Sablayrolles, A. · Roux, A. · Mensch, A. · et al.