LANGUAGE MODEL MiniMax Last updated:

MiniMax M2

Lightning-Fast Open Reasoning

MiniMax's October 2025 reasoning model — 230B total parameters but only 10B active per token thanks to mixture-of-experts. The 10B active count means it's drastically cheaper to serve than peers while still scoring at frontier reasoning levels. Released open under the MIT license.

Intelligence
Good
Speed
Slow
62 tok/s output
Cost
Moderate
$0.30 in / $1.20 out
Context
200K
Up to 200,000 tokens
How are Intelligence, Speed & Cost bucketed?
Intelligence and Speed buckets are percentile ranks on Artificial Analysis. Cost buckets are fixed dollar thresholds keyed off output-token price ($/M out).
Intelligence
  • Top 1%≤ 1%
  • Top 5%≤ 5%
  • Top 10%≤ 10%
  • Good≤ 25%
  • Medium≤ 50%
  • Below avg> 50%
Speed
  • Top 1%≥ 345 tok/s
  • Top 5%≥ 237 tok/s
  • Top 10%≥ 196 tok/s
  • Good≥ 146 tok/s
  • Medium≥ 90 tok/s
  • Slow< 90 tok/s
Cost
  • Freeopen weights · self-host
  • Low< $1 / M out
  • Moderate$1–5 / M out
  • High≥ $5 / M out

Why it matters

Showed that Lightning Attention + ultra-low active-parameter MoE can match denser reasoning models on benchmarks while serving 5× faster. Reframes "frontier" along the cost-per-token axis, not just quality.

Core Capabilities

Long Documents
Handles entire codebases, books, and multi-doc RAG.
Generative
Produces images, video, audio, or other media.
Reasoning
Solves complex math, logic, and planning tasks.
Coding
Strong real-world software engineering.

Context Window

200k tokens
≈ 154+ pages
4k Chat 聊天
32k Long docs 长文档
128k Books 整本书
400k Multi-doc 多文档
1M Codebase 整个代码库
10M
200k

Availability

API
Not available
Product / App
Not available
Open Source
Released
Enterprise

Pricing Model

Free / self-host
Open weights — pay only for compute.
Self-host

Capability / Performance

Where this model sits relative to the middle 60% of models in the tree. All scores are 0–10 (higher is better).

Lower 20% Upper 80% This model
Reasoning
AA Intelligence Index · scaled to 10
1.7
5.6
7.1
Coding
SciCode · scaled to 10
1.8
4.3
4.7
Agentic tasks
Terminal-Bench Hard · scaled to 10
0.2
3.6
3.9
Context / memory
Context window size · log-scaled
6.0
9.0
6.7
Cost efficiency
Input price ($/M tokens) · cheaper scores higher
6.2
10.0
10.0
Lower 20% 20th percentile — 20% of models score below this This model Where the current model lands Upper 80% 80th percentile — only 20% of models score above this Percentile boundaries are computed across every model in the tree that reports the underlying benchmark for each capability.

What it feels like

  • Language model from MiniMax — see the linked sources below for benchmark and review coverage
  • Code-leaning workloads are the typical fit per the published model card
  • Tool-use and agent loops are the typical fit per the published model card

Best use cases

  • Coding workflows that match the model's published benchmarks
  • Agent / tool-use workflows that match the model's published benchmarks
  • See the model spec and sources block for benchmarked use cases

Tools to try

Not ideal for

  • Tasks far outside the modalities listed in this model's spec
  • Workflows where a more recent successor in the same family scores higher