LANGUAGE MODEL Cohere Last updated:

Command-R (Mar '24)

Command-R (Mar '24) is an API model from Cohere. It’s positioned for general text tasks—work that benefits from iteration, not just one-shot answers.

Intelligence
Below avg
Cost
Moderate
$0.50 in / $1.50 out
Context
128K
Up to 128,000 tokens
How are Intelligence, Speed & Cost bucketed?
Intelligence and Speed buckets are percentile ranks on Artificial Analysis. Cost buckets are fixed dollar thresholds keyed off output-token price ($/M out).
Intelligence
  • Top 1%≤ 1%
  • Top 5%≤ 5%
  • Top 10%≤ 10%
  • Good≤ 25%
  • Medium≤ 50%
  • Below avg> 50%
Speed
  • Top 1%≥ 345 tok/s
  • Top 5%≥ 237 tok/s
  • Top 10%≥ 196 tok/s
  • Good≥ 146 tok/s
  • Medium≥ 90 tok/s
  • Slow< 90 tok/s
Cost
  • Freeopen weights · self-host
  • Low< $1 / M out
  • Moderate$1–5 / M out
  • High≥ $5 / M out

Core Capabilities

Long Documents
Handles entire codebases, books, and multi-doc RAG.

Context Window

128k tokens
≈ 98 pages
4k Chat 聊天
32k Long docs 长文档
128k This model 本模型
400k Multi-doc 多文档
1M Codebase 整个代码库
10M

Availability

API
Available
Product / App
Not available
Open Source
Not released
Enterprise
Contact sales

Pricing Model

Free / self-host
Open weights — pay only for compute.
Self-host

Capability / Performance

Where this model sits relative to the middle 60% of models in the tree. All scores are 0–10 (higher is better).

Lower 20% Upper 80% This model
Reasoning
AA Intelligence Index · scaled to 10
1.7
5.6
1.1
Coding
SciCode · scaled to 10
1.8
4.3
0.6
Context / memory
Context window size · log-scaled
6.0
9.0
6.0
Cost efficiency
Input price ($/M tokens) · cheaper scores higher
6.2
10.0
10.0
Lower 20% 20th percentile — 20% of models score below this This model Where the current model lands Upper 80% 80th percentile — only 20% of models score above this Percentile boundaries are computed across every model in the tree that reports the underlying benchmark for each capability.

What it feels like

  • Smaller / cheaper Command R — tier below Command R+.
  • Industry-leading RAG with in-line citations baked into the response — Cohere's signature differentiator
  • 104B params, 88.2% MMLU at release — competitive with GPT-4 Turbo on enterprise tasks
  • Beats Claude 3 Sonnet, Mistral Large, and GPT-4 Turbo on Cohere's internal RAG / tool-use benchmarks

Best use cases

  • Enterprise RAG where citation accuracy and hallucination reduction matter most
  • Multi-step tool-use agents in regulated industries
  • Multilingual customer-facing assistants beyond English

Tools to try

Not ideal for

  • Frontier-leaderboard reasoning by 2025 — newer Cohere Command-A and competitors lead
  • Consumer / chatbot use cases where personality and creativity matter